The F-8E(FN) Crusader
From 1964 to 1999, the LTV F-8E(FN) Crusader was the sole interceptor
in Aéronavale service. Although it was maintained in service
for too long, this aircraft, whose design dates back to the 1950's,
was remarkably popular with its pilots. This document does not cover
the development of early Crusader variants but only that of the F-8E(FN).
1. Origins and development of the F-8E(FN) Crusader
1.1 Origins
In 1962, the French Aéronavale (Naval Air Arm) submitted a request
for a new naval fighter to replace its Aquilon aboard the new aircraft
carriers, the Foch and Clémenceau. Of the several proposals made
by French aircraft manufacturers, none were selected. Dassault proposed
a navalized version of its Mirage III, the Mirage IIIM, while Bréguet
offered the Br 1120 Sirocco. These very advanced and ambitious
projects were deemed too expensive and probably technologically hazardous.
The Marine Nationale therefore decided to search for a foreign design.
The only two competitors remaining were thus the McDonnell Douglas
F-4 Phantom II and the F-8 Crusader, manufactured by the Ling-Temco-Vought
(LTV) company. A delegation was sent to the US to determine which of
these two aircraft would be best suited to perform aerial protection
of the French carrier groups. This delegation included the CC Hurel
of the Bureau des Etudes Techniques (Technical Studies Board), M. Faucheux
of the Service Technique Aéronautique (Air Technical Service)
as well as another engineer.
Although the Phantom II was more capable, it was clearly established
that it was not suited for operations from French aircraft carriers,
which were substantially smaller than American ones. The French delegation
therefore turned to the F-8 Crusader. On 16 March 1962, two F-8 of VF-32,
based on USS Saratoga, led carrier suitability trials on the Clémenceau,
demonstrating that the Crusader could operated off French carriers.
1.2 Development of the F-8E(FN)
Following this, LTV offered the Marine Nationale a modified version
of the F-8E, specifically designed to operate off French carriers with
a lower landing speed.. This version was designated F-8E(FN), standing
for French Navy.
The reduction of landing speed was made possible through several modifications.
The leading edge slats were split lengthwise, which increased their
drooping angle to 44°. Flap and aileron droop was also increased
to 40°. These modifications substantially increased the camber of
the wing in landing configuration, generating more lift and therefore
lowering stall speed. A blown flaps system (known as BLC – Boundary
Layer Control) was also use. This used air taken from the engine's compressor
and ejected it through adjustable vents located over the flaps and ailerons.
The air flow progressively increased as flaps were lowered. The angle
of the variable wing was also reduced to 5° in place of the 7°
of previous Crusader models. (Some sources claim the wing's angle was
increased from 5°to 7°, but it was indeed a reduction from 7°
to 5°). Also, the surface of the horizontal tailplane was increased
to give better control at low speeds.
This set of modifications had already been suggested to the US Navy
by LTV but the Navy was satisfied enough with the Crusader's behaviour
during approach and had not modified its F-8 fleet. The modifications
allowed a decrease of 15 knots in the Crusader's landing speed and made
it far less touchy during landing. A few years later, most US Crusaders
received a mid-life update including the modifications designed for
the F-8E(FN).
The F-8E(FN) prototype in 1964. (Photo: US Navy) |
Other modifications concerned the weaponry. The F-8E(FN) kept the standard
four gun and AIM-9 missile armament but was modified to be compatible
with the French Matra R.530. The R.530 had a greater exhaust plume and
a titanium deflector was added to protect the aircraft's flank while
firing missiles. The Matra missile existed both in IR- and radar-guided
versions, so a Magnavox AN/APQ-104 radar was installed as well as a
modified AN/AWG-4 fire control system. The F-8E(FN) did not carry an
IRST, unlike most American Crusaders.
A 65 million US$ contract (AM-114-104) was signed, for the delivery
of 40 single-seater and 6 twin-seater Crusaders, as well as a large
stock of spares and engine. However, when Congress canceled the development
of the “Twosader” trainer, the order was modified to 42
single-seaters. For administrative reasons, the US Navy gave the aircraft
Bureau Numbers 115 to 151773.
F-8D # 147036 was then modified by LTV to become the F-8E(FN) prototype.
In addition to the modifications already described, it was equipped
with a stall warning system, an autothrottle to maintain speed during
approach, a J-57P-20A engine and measuring equipment. It first flew
on 27 February 1964 under the designation YF-8E(FN). On April 11, during
the 21st flight flown by Bob Rostine, the prototype crashed and was
completely destroyed. Testing started again on June 26 when the first
serial-production aircraft was fitted with a special probe and measuring
equipment to carry on with the testing program.
Simultaneously, weapons trial for the R.530 started in April on F-8E's
based at China Lake NAS. Crusaders #2, 3 and 4 were also used for weapons
trials. As early as November 1964, carrier launches and landings were
carried out on USS Shangri-La, whose dimensions were roughly similar
to those of the French carriers. These tests were carried out by James
H. Flatley, Yves Goupil and Dick Gralow on French Crusaders #2 and 3.
Following this successful trials campaign, the French Crusader was deemed
ready to enter operational service in late 1964.
During its career, the F-8E(FN) was modernized on several occasions.
Its weaponry was progressively improved. Its four Sidewinder armament
was rarely used and abandoned in 1986. The Crusaders were often equipped
with the Matra R.530, whose reliability was quite bad. In 1980, a 65%
failure rate was recorded, but the missile was kept in inventory until
the late 1980's. A mix of one radar-guided and one IR-guided R.530 was
often carried by the Crusader.
The R.530 was replaced by the Matra R.550 Magic I, which was fitied
to the Crusader in 1973. It was far more capable and reliable than the
R.530 or early Sidewinders. The Super 530 was never used, as the AN.APQ-104
radar could not be made compatible with that missile. In 1988, the modernized
Magic II was also introduced.
Among other systems used on the Crusader, one might note a winch fitted
on the port side if the fuselage to pull a target for gunnery training.
This system was abandoned in 1988.
In 1979, the J-57P-20A engines were equipped with a new afterburning
system.
An F-8E(FN) just after landing on the USS Eisenhower during Joint
Exercises. It carries a training Matra R.530 on the fuselage attachment
point. (Photo US Navy) |
1.3 The renovated Crusader – F-8P
In the late 1980's, the Marine Nationale faced an ever-increasing problem:
its Crusader fleet was growing quite old and its replacement, the Rafale,
could not be expected before the second half of the 1990's at best.
Two options were considered. The first consisted in renting or purchasing
F/A-18 Hornets from the US Navy as an interim measure while waiting
for the Rafale. The other solution was to modernize the Crusader. Vice-Amiral
Goupil, one of the first Crusader pilots,was one of the proponents of
the Hornet solution and expressed his opinion and concern in the French
Navy magazine “Cols Bleus” on 21 October 1989:
The F/A-18 had already been evaluated by the Armée de l'Air
and the Aéronavale in 1970 but no order had been placed. If the
Hornet was inferior to the Crusader, as far as pure speed was concerned,
it was nonetheless far more versatile and modern. Dassault was nevertheless
worried that this might endanger its Rafale program and strongly opposed
the idea. According to Goupil, only the Hornet purchase/rental option
could give the Aéronavale the capacity to protect its carriers.
Goupil insisted on the fact that maintaining the Crusader operational
until 1996, the supposed (and optimistic) date of arrival of the Rafale,
would be very expensive and of a limited interest. Some talk was made
about fitting Mirage F.1 avionics and equipment on the Crusader but,
as Goupil pointed out, “fitting the 1950's Crusader a technology
dating back to 1975 could hardly be called modernization”.
The debate went on for a while but this time the French aeronautical
industry won and it was decided to renovate the F-8E(FN) Crusader while
waiting for the Rafale. The winning argument was that if the Aéronavale
were to equip with F/A-18s, the Armée de l'Air would be compelled
to pay for the Rafale development on its own, which would have jeopardized
the entire program. In the country's best interest, it was decided to
simply overhaul the F-8's.
Seventeen aircraft were to be modified by the aviation works in Cuers
between 1990 and 1997: one aircraft every 18 month. Crusader #35 was
the first to be modified and, in April 1993, underwent operational trials
on the Clémenceau.
The renovated F-8E(FN) was designated F-8P for prolongé (extended
life). It was more of an overhaul than a modernization, although some
modern equipment was fitted. The entire electrical and hydraulic system
was replaced, and the structure was inspected for fatigue and reinforced.
A Martin-Baker Mk 7 zero-zero ejection seat replaced the older zero-120
model. The radar and flight control systems were reconditioned.
Only the avionics were really modernized. A VOR/ILS system was fitted,
as well as an IFF, a GPS, a TACAN, a radar altimeter and a Thompson-CSF
Sherloc radar warning receiver. The RWR was fitted in a rectangular
fitting on the aircraft's fin, which distinguishes the F-8P from its
predecessor. The cockpit layout was also changed and a new inertial
navigation system, similar to that of the Mirage F.1, was installed.
Despite the overhaul, the “Crouze” (as it was called by
the French) was obsolete: it was not adapted to modern warfare environments
and maintenance was increasingly difficult and heavy. The Crusader production
lines had been stopped a long time ago and the French Navy depended
on the Davis-Monthan AFB boneyard in Arizona for spares, when it didn't
have to manufacture them itself.
|